Thoughts on Black holes 		 
 

There are a number of websites that can give you a reasonable understanding of black holes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_holes is a good example. This website uses the black hole extreme to illustrate how gravity is a state of energy in much the same way as matter and electromagnetic waves are other states.

Thinking of a black hole as dense matter may be a mistake.
I doubt that atoms can be compressed. A black hole is not going to be made of tightly packed atoms and I doubt that they will consist of tightly packed neutrons either. My feeling is that matter, as we understand it, does not exist in this kind of environment.
So what are we left with? It's a form of energy - the structure of what constitutes matter has broken down and converted to its base energy state.

So, if you more or less accept this concept, the question arises "if matter doesn't exist in a black hole how could there be any gravity?".

In case you are wondering, mass is a property of matter - no matter no mass, no mass no gravity. However, this is obviously not true. Gravity, or a similar effect to gravity, can exist in the absence of matter.

 
 Frame dragging with spinning Black Holes  

Frame dragging is a term used to describe a gravitational anomaly that can occur around spinning or moving matter. Here on earth, gravity acts vertically. In a sense, this determines our personal frame of reference, our personal spacetime continuum. However, start spinning the earth faster and what was previously our vertical will start to change. Just suppose we could spin the earth at speeds approaching that of light, gravity, at the equator, would be acting almost horizontal.

The image above shows a spinning black hole. The high gravity and relatively small radius allows for a very high spin rate. The direction of the flow of aether into the black hole means that something falling towards the black hole will fall obliquely and not towards the centre.

Frame dragging around spinning black holes affects the frequency of electromagnetic radiation. As shown in the diagram, light or any other wave type emission passing or issuing from one side of object will show differing wavelengths from the other side depending on the rate of spin.



 The life cycle of a black hole  

I think we need to differentiate between spinning and non spinning black holes as their origins may not be the same.
I feel comfortable with the idea of a dying star expanding then dragging back its offspring (in our case, us, Jupiter Uranus etc) to form an object massive enough to collapse to form a black hole. The second type may not be from the death of a system but from the birth of a system. Another type of black hole is probably born prior to a galaxy's overall creation. As a hydrogen gas cloud shrinks under its own gravity a critical moment is reached when massive energy is released at the centre. Relatively speaking, this is equivalent to a mini Big Bang. The energy released has a domino effect, acting as a catalyst, and impinges on the surrounding gas which then spawns the other stars and they, in turn, form their own solar systems.
In this arena, the birth of a galaxy, it is likely that there is a critical radius from the centre, similar to what is known as an 'event horizon'. It is an area where matter has sufficient kinetic energy to exceed an escape velocity. Matter within this area is likely to spiral down into the centre of the system.
After a certain amount of energy is expended and the surrounding gas beneath the critical radius has been used up then the mega star starts to die, expanding then contracting in ever increasing frequency.
A time is reached when it 'gasps' its final pulse and compacts enough to form a black hole.

However, its existence as a physical entity is not yet over.

Now, what happens next is difficult to comprehend because we have to think beyond the physical world of matter and particles. We even have to go beyond the energy world, well almost. We go into the realm of what matter actually is, where it comes from and how it is made.
It is the purpose of this website to persuade you that it comes from a type of energy. We know the link between matter and mass and the link between mass and energy. What does energy look like when it isn't matter and it isn't vibrating as in electromagnetic radiation? I call it 'motional energy'. Other terms could be 'aether', 'quantum state', 'Higgs' field, 'dark matter', 'dark energy'. Pick whichever one you feel most comfortable with.


  • A black hole has very high gravity.
  • Space is not a vacuum, it contains 'field' (also known as aether, æther or ether, dark energy, motional energy etc. etc.).
  • Gravity is caused by the movement of this 'field'.
  • Ironically, the core of fundamental matter is predominantly more of an absolute vacuum than space itself.
  • Field slowly seeps into this vacuum to neutralise it (matter returns to its non energised state)
and as a consequence
  • eventually the Black Hole just disappears - weird isn't it?


 Where does interstellar hydrogen come from?  

It either comes from the collision of two or more aether energy fields or more commonly something that causes a turbulence in an existing aether field.
An electromagnetic wave provided with enough energy will reach an energy saturation level. It will lose its sinusoidal wave like resonance and cause the aether to break into particulate matter.

 What is 'dark matter'?

'Dark matter' is not matter at all but a term that is used to try and explain the anomalies that can be observed in the predicted trajectories of stars and the behaviour of the observed universe as a whole. It has been concluded, by some, that the distortions must be caused by space containing significantly more matter than first thought.
However, active gravitational fields can exist which are independent of matter being present, anywhere. It is the motion of these fields (motional energy) that distort Kepler's vision.



 

---------------------------